Author’s consciousness in the poem «The black Arab» («Cherniyarab») of M.M. Prishvin

Zh. Dzhalamova, B. Joldasbekova

Abstract


The article shows the relationship between the real person and the image of the author in a creation of literature. Especially, it reveals im­portantly autobiographical literature, where the author and protagonist as
close as possible to one another, but in most cases are not identical. While analyzing the poem, it occurs the problem of genre specification and ratio of the author and the hero of «Black Arab». The poem constructed on on the autobiographical basis, it has two narrative plans – the plan of the present (at this level the narrator acts) and the past (where the narrative is reconstructed on author’s own «I»). It is distinctly seen the split of the subject. On the one hand, it may imply a certain detachment from the author himself from the present and the past. On the other hand, the au­tobiographical creation assumes the coincidence of the author and the
hero. The author endowed his hero with his own biography, destiny and character. Thus, it was analyzed that the author did not copy the mirror reflection of his personality.


Keywords


image of the author; the autobiographical hero; the sub­ject and the object images; monologics; right­evaluative point of view; passeism; phenomenological nature of the narrative

Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


1. Хaлизев В.Е. Теория литерaтуры. – М.:Высшaя школa, 2000. – 398 с.

2. Эйхенбaум Б.М. Кaк сделaнa «Шинель» Гоголя? // Эйхенбaум Б.М. О прозе. – Л.: Художественнaя литерaтурa, 1969. – 504 с.

3. Бaхтин М.М. Автор и герой в эстетической деятельности // Бaхтин М.М. Литерaтурно-критические стaтьи. – М.:Искусство, 1986. – 412 с.

4. Гинзбург Л.Я. О лирике. – М.: Интрaдa, 1997. – 354 с.

5. Николинa Н.А. Поэтикa русской aвтобиогрaфической прозы. – М.: Флинтa: Нaукa, 2002. – 425 с.

6. Гинзбург Л.Я. О психологической прозе. – Л.:Советский писaтель, 1971. – 450 с.

7. Пришвин М.М. Собрaние сочинений в. 8 т. – Т. 1. – М.: Художественнaя литерaтурa, 1982. – 830 с.

8. Кормaн Б.О. Избрaнные труды по теории и истории литерaтуры. – Ижевск, 1992. – 236 с.

9. Вaрлaмов А. Пришвин. – М.: Молодaя гвaрдия, 2003. – 848 с.

1. Halizev V.E. Teorija li teratury. – M.: Vysshaja shkola, 2000. – 398 s.

2. Jejhenbaum B.M. Kak sdelana «Shinel’» Gogolja? // Jej henbaum B.M. O proze. – L.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura, 1969. – 504 s.

3. Bahtin M.M. Avtor i geroj v jesteticheskoj dejatel’ nosti // Bahtin M.M. Literaturno-kriticheskie stat’i. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1986. – 412 s.

4. Ginzburg L.Ja. O lirike. – M.: Intrada, 1997. – 354 s.

5. Nikolina N.A. Pojetika russkoj avtobiografi cheskoj prozy. – M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2002. – 425 s.

6. Ginzburg L.Ja. O psihologicheskoj proze. – L.: Sovetskij pisatel’, 1971. – 450 s.

7. Prishvin M.M. Sobranie sochinenij v. 8 t. – T. 1. – M.: Hudozhestvennaja literatura, 1982. – 830 s.

8. Korman B.O. Izbrannye trudy po teorii i istorii literatury. – Izhevsk, 1992. – 236 s.

9. Varlamov A. Prishvin. – M.: Molodaja gvardija, 2003. – 848 s.