The role of modern architecture in the synthesis of arts design and tapestry
12 30
Keywords:
monumental arts, contemporary tapestry, Kazakhstan, art textile, architecture, modern arts, design.Abstract
This article is devoted to consideration of modern problems of interaction and art synthesis of architectural and spatial environment and design and gobelin (tapestry) art. The author analyzes the interrelations and contradictions taking place between these types of art and having paradoxical nature, and also the nature of their appearance. Thanks to technical progress and processes of urbanization, art of architecture and of design rapidly developing. At the same time technological and artistic aspects of creation of gobelins (tapestries) did not change in their essence since origin of this art form. The author comes to the conclusion: in the latest conditions gobelin (tapestry) art has to be changed, and, by searching new technological and creative decisions, to find a compromise with art of architectural interior and art of design. But along this way gobelin (tapestry) must keep a cultural emphasis of the national heritage and the author’s artistic style so as not to turn on the wall of a modern interior to a featureless abstract decorative spotReferences
1.1. Медоев А. Камень и эстетика номадов // В кн.: Кочевники. Эстетика. – Алматы: Гылым, 1993. – С. 107.
2.2. Мастера советской архитектуры об архитектуре. – М., 1975. – Т. 1. – С. 35.
3.3. Гинзбург М.Я. Ритм в архитектуре. – М., 1923. – С. 28-29.
4.4. Иконников А. Архитектура Запада на пороге XXI века // Декоративное искусство СССР. – М., 1987. – № 9. – С. 27-29.
5.5. Переверзнев Л.Б. Искусство и кибернетика. – М., 1968. – С. 95.
6.6. Иоффе И. Культура и стиль. – М., 1927. – С. 11.
7.7. Мельников К.С. Архитектура моей жизни. – М., 1967. – С. 117.
References
1.1. Medoev A. Kamen’ i ehstetika nomadov // V kn.: Kochevniki. EHstetika. – Almaty: Gylym, 1993. – S. 107.
2.2. Mastera sovetskoj arhitektury ob arhitekture. – Moskva, 1975. – T. 1. – S. 35.
3.3. Ginzburg M.YA. Ritm v arhitekture. – Moskva, 1923. – S. 28-29.
4.4. Ikonnikov A. Arhitektura Zapada na poroge XXI veka // Dekorativnoe iskusstvo SSSR. – Moskva, 1987. – № 9. – S. 27-29.
5.5. Pereverznev L.B. Iskusstvo i kibernetika. – Moskva, 1968. – S. 95.
6.6. Ioffe I. Kul’tura i stil’. – Moskva, 1927. – S. 11.
7 Mel’nikov K.S. Arhitektura moej zhizni. Moskva, 1967. – S. 117.
2.2. Мастера советской архитектуры об архитектуре. – М., 1975. – Т. 1. – С. 35.
3.3. Гинзбург М.Я. Ритм в архитектуре. – М., 1923. – С. 28-29.
4.4. Иконников А. Архитектура Запада на пороге XXI века // Декоративное искусство СССР. – М., 1987. – № 9. – С. 27-29.
5.5. Переверзнев Л.Б. Искусство и кибернетика. – М., 1968. – С. 95.
6.6. Иоффе И. Культура и стиль. – М., 1927. – С. 11.
7.7. Мельников К.С. Архитектура моей жизни. – М., 1967. – С. 117.
References
1.1. Medoev A. Kamen’ i ehstetika nomadov // V kn.: Kochevniki. EHstetika. – Almaty: Gylym, 1993. – S. 107.
2.2. Mastera sovetskoj arhitektury ob arhitekture. – Moskva, 1975. – T. 1. – S. 35.
3.3. Ginzburg M.YA. Ritm v arhitekture. – Moskva, 1923. – S. 28-29.
4.4. Ikonnikov A. Arhitektura Zapada na poroge XXI veka // Dekorativnoe iskusstvo SSSR. – Moskva, 1987. – № 9. – S. 27-29.
5.5. Pereverznev L.B. Iskusstvo i kibernetika. – Moskva, 1968. – S. 95.
6.6. Ioffe I. Kul’tura i stil’. – Moskva, 1927. – S. 11.
7 Mel’nikov K.S. Arhitektura moej zhizni. Moskva, 1967. – S. 117.
Downloads
How to Cite
Mukanov М. F. (2016). The role of modern architecture in the synthesis of arts design and tapestry. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 155(3). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/1565
Issue
Section
Culture
