Sufism in Mamed Aslan’s creativity in the context of pluralism of ideas and the freedom of speech

Authors

  • С. С. Байрамов университет Кавказ
        24 17

Keywords:

Sufism, Mammed Aslan, Turkic – Islamic world, pluralism, globalization.

Abstract

The new approach of Azerbaijani literary spheres, especially from the samples of the works of Mammed Aslan, on new conditions of community after Post Soviet era is one of the important topics of this article. The Western humanist is also has the interest in the suggested solutions for the main problems of society in Turkic – Islamic world which make the distinguishing feature of the article. In other words, the article has global feature and importance. The main argue of the article is Sufism as interpretation of Islam in modern period for the development and integration of the Turkic – Islamic world and its contribution to World community. The author considers that, how many and difficult problems weren’t numerous, there are also ways of their permission. Аt the solution of these problems it would be useful to address to historical sources, in particular, to the sources, institutes which created conditions for education in the tyurkoMuslim world of the states, powerful from the military-political and moral and spiritual points of view in the Middle Ages and which didn’t lose the importance to this day.

References

1 1.Байрамов С. Проблемы «культуры критики» в азербайджанских реалиях. http://www.1news.az/analytics/20100407012722286.html
2 2.Куруджан А. Диалог и толерантность в Исламе. – Хазар: Xəzər, 2008. – 122 с. (на азерб. яз.)
3 3.Буладж А. Религия и народ. Пример Ф. Гюлена. – Стамбул: Уфук китаб, 2008. (на турецком яз.)
4 4.Бахшелиев Ф. Ирфан и суфизм в системе национальной памяти. – Баку: Элм и тахсил, 2010. – 463 с. (на азерб.языке)
5 5.Arnold M., Culture and Anarchy: An Essay in Political and Social Criticism. – 1869. http://www.victorianweb.org/victorian/ authors/
6 6.Azeri şair Mehmet Arslan ile Nat-ı Şerif üzerine... O iki gecede O (s.a.)-nun Şahsiyeti ile bütünleştim. – Altınoluk dergisi, 1994, iyun. – Sayı: 101. – S. 38.
7 7.Аслан М. Переходя хребет Арзурума. – Баку: Ишыг, 1985. – 250 с. (на азерб. яз.)
8 8.Рыхтым Мехмет. Сеид Яхья Бакуви и халватизм. – Баку: Гисмет, 2005. (на азерб. языке)
9 9.Интервью с проф. Мустафа Ашкар // Общественный журнал Ирфан. – Июнь, № 31. (на азерб. яз.)
10 10.Чаркезоглы А. Не вернуть тот Кельбаджар, даже если вернется 100 Кельбаджаров // Газета Заман. – 2008, 4-6 октября. – № 115. – С. 8. (на азерб. яз.)
11 11.Arnold, Matthew. The Function of Criticism at the Present Time // Critical Theory Since Plato. Ed. Hazard Adams. – New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1971. – С. 592-603.
12 12.Халилов С. Философский слой романтической поэзии или момент красоты мысли // Международный симпозиум Ибн Араби // Литературная газета. – 2009, 9 октября. – № 38. – С. 1-4 (на азерб. яз.)
13 13.Эмерсон К. Об одной постсоветской журнальной полемике // Вопросы литературы. – 2005. –№ 4

1 1.Bajramov S. Problemy «kul’tury kritiki» v azerbajdzhanskih realijah. http://www.1news.az/analytics/20100407012722286. html
2 2.Kurudzhan A. Dialog i tolerantnost’ v Islame. – Hazar: Xəzər, 2008. – 122 s. (na azerb. jaz.)
3 3.Buladzh A. Religija i narod. Primer F. Gjulena. – Stambul: Ufuk kitab, 2008. (na tureckom jaz.)
4 4.Bahsheliev F. Irfan i sufizm v sisteme nacional’noj pamjati. – Baku: Jelm i tahsil, 2010. –463 s. (na azerb.jazyke)
5 5.Arnold M., Culture and Anarchy: An Essay in Political and Social Criticism. – 1869. http://www.victorianweb.org/victorian/ authors/ ISSN 1563-0223 KazNU Bulletin. Philology series. №5 (157). 2015 127 Байрамов С.С.
6 6.Azeri şair Mehmet Arslan ile Nat-ı Şerif üzerine... O iki gecede O (s.a.)-nun Şahsiyeti ile bütünleştim. – Altınoluk dergisi, 1994, iyun. – Sayı: 101. – S. 38.
7 7.Aslan M. Perehodja hrebet Arzuruma. – Baku: Ishyg, 1985. – 250 s. (na azerb. jaz.)
8 8.Ryhtym Mehmet. Seid Jah’ja Bakuvi i halvatizm. – Baku: Gismet, 2005. (na azerb. jazyke)
9 9.Interv’ju s prof. Mustafa Ashkar // Obshhestvennyj zhurnal Irfan. – Ijun’, № 31. (na azerb. jaz.)
10 10.Charkezogly A. Ne vernut’ tot Kel’badzhar, dazhe esli vernetsja 100 Kel’badzharov // Gazeta Zaman. – 2008, 4-6 oktjabrja. – № 115. – S. 8. (na azerb. jaz.)
11 11.Arnold, Matthew. The Function of Criticism at the Present Time // Critical Theory Since Plato. Ed. Hazard Adams. – New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1971. – S. 592-603.
12 12.Halilov S. Filosofskij sloj romanticheskoj pojezii ili moment krasoty mysli // Mezhdunarodnyj simpozium Ibn Arabi // Literaturnaja gazeta. – 2009, 9 oktjabrja. – № 38. – S. 1-4 (na azerb. jaz.)
13 13.Jemerson K. Ob odnoj postsovetskoj zhurnal’noj polemike // Voprosy literatury. – 2005. – № 4.

Downloads

How to Cite

Байрамов, С. С. (2016). Sufism in Mamed Aslan’s creativity in the context of pluralism of ideas and the freedom of speech. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 157(5). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/1618