Model of literary archetype
21 12
Keywords:
archetype, mythology, mythological motives, «collective unconscious», model.Abstract
In this article discusses the use of archetypes in literature. The problem archetypes’ artistic refraction in a literary work has attracted the attention of researchers of the XX century. Archetypal images or pre-forms, as defined by Carl Jung, are a manifestation of the «collective unconscious», accompany a person over the centuries and are reflected in mythology, religion, art. A lot of literary and artistic images and / or motives grow out of a certain archetypal core, conceptually enriching its original scheme. At the same period in literary scholarship is growing awareness that in the analysis of literary and artistic work becomes more important not so much reconstruction of mythopoetic layer as definition of ideological load of certain archetypal components. The researchers conclude that the term «archetype» refers to the most common, fundamental and universal mythological motives, which form the basis of any of artistic and mythological structures and believe that in the XX century grow a tendency to move away from purely mythological and psychological understanding of the archetype to the adoption of a model of literary archetype.References
1 1.Юнг К.Г. Душа и миф. Шесть архетипов. – Киев: Государственная библиотека Украины для юношества, 1996.
2 2.Юнг К.Г. Архетип и символ. – M.: Ренессанс, 1991.
3 3.Тургенев И.С. Полное собрание сочинений и писем:
В 30 т. – М., 1980 . – С. 259-272.
4 4.Мелетинский Е.М. О литературных архетипах. – М., 1994.
5 5.Хиллман Дж. Архетипическая психология. – М.: Когито-
Центр, 2006.
6 6.Юнг К. Г. Проблемы души нашего времени. – СПб.: Питер, 2002. – 352 с.
7 7.Юнг К. Г. Психология бессознательного. – М.: Канон+,
2003. – 400 с.
1 1.Yung K.G. Dusha i mif. Shest’ arhetipov. – Kiev: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996.
2 2.Yung K.G. Arhetip i simvol. – M.: Renessans, 1991.
3 3.Turgenev I.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy i pisem: V 30 t. – M., 1980 . – S. 259-272.
4 4.Meletinskiy E.M. O literaturnyh arhetipah. – M., 1994.
5 5.Hillman Dzh. Arhetipicheskaya psihologiya. – M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2006.
6 6.Yung K. G. Problemy dushi nashego vremeni. – SPb.: Piter, 2002. – 352 s.
7 7.Yung K. G. Psihologiya bessoznatel’nogo. – M.: Kanon+, 2003. – 400 s.
2 2.Юнг К.Г. Архетип и символ. – M.: Ренессанс, 1991.
3 3.Тургенев И.С. Полное собрание сочинений и писем:
В 30 т. – М., 1980 . – С. 259-272.
4 4.Мелетинский Е.М. О литературных архетипах. – М., 1994.
5 5.Хиллман Дж. Архетипическая психология. – М.: Когито-
Центр, 2006.
6 6.Юнг К. Г. Проблемы души нашего времени. – СПб.: Питер, 2002. – 352 с.
7 7.Юнг К. Г. Психология бессознательного. – М.: Канон+,
2003. – 400 с.
1 1.Yung K.G. Dusha i mif. Shest’ arhetipov. – Kiev: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996.
2 2.Yung K.G. Arhetip i simvol. – M.: Renessans, 1991.
3 3.Turgenev I.S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy i pisem: V 30 t. – M., 1980 . – S. 259-272.
4 4.Meletinskiy E.M. O literaturnyh arhetipah. – M., 1994.
5 5.Hillman Dzh. Arhetipicheskaya psihologiya. – M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2006.
6 6.Yung K. G. Problemy dushi nashego vremeni. – SPb.: Piter, 2002. – 352 s.
7 7.Yung K. G. Psihologiya bessoznatel’nogo. – M.: Kanon+, 2003. – 400 s.
Downloads
How to Cite
Афанасьева, А. С. (2016). Model of literary archetype. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 153(1). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/1738
Issue
Section
Young Authors
