Grotesque: theory and application
55 78
Keywords:
grotesque, fantastic, illogic, parody, mismatch, reality, convention, satirical purpose.Abstract
The article deals with the theoretical basis and the application of the grotesque as a method of comic literature. The material of the study are the work of foreign and domestic literature, since they are the foundation of the theory formed the grotesque. Grotesque – a species of comic technique that combines fantastic shape horrible and funny, ugly, and the sublime, combining incongruous, unreal with the real twist, deconstructs reality. As an artistic image of the grotesque different duality, contrast. Grotesque – always a deviation from the norm, a convention, an exaggeration, deliberate caricature, so it is widely used for satirical purposes. This article explores the universal concept of the grotesque. For example, the works of Kazakh writer T. Shapay highlighted the main features and functions of the grotesque. In some works of the writer may be a wonderful addition to the ordinary, and using figurative language turns into an incredible truthful. The author makes fun of the negative phenomena of society. Describing a phenomenon implies the real objects. To show the seriousness of these problems, the author uses various grotesque tone.References
1 1.Козлова Д.В. Гротеск в теории искусства // Вопросы
взаимовлияния литератур. – Н. Новгород, 1997. – С. 209.
2.Николаев Д.П. Сатира Щедрина и реалистический
гротеск. – М., 1977. – С. 358.
3 3.Бахтин М.М. Литературно-критические статьи. – М.: Худ. лит., 1986. – С. 543.
4 4.Қожакеев Т. Сатира негіздері. – Алматы: Санат, 1996. – 464 б.
5 5.Дормидонова Т.Ю. Гротеск как литературоведческая
проблема // Известия РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена. – 2008. – №51. – С. 86-95.
6 6.Шапай Т. Қазақтың жаны. – Астана: Елорда, 2001. – 284 б.
1 1.Kozlova D.V. Grotesk v teorii iskusstva // Voprosy vzaimovliyaniya literatur. – N. Novgorod, 1997. – S. 209.
2 2.Nikolaev D.P. Satira SHCHedrina i realisticheskij grotesk. – M., 1977. – S. 358.
3 3.Bahtin M.M. Literaturno-kriticheskie stat’i. – M.: Hud. lit., 1986. – S. 543.
4 4.Qozhakeev T. Sati’ra negіzderі. – Almaty’: Sanat, 1996. – 464 b.
5 5.Dormidonova T.YU. Grotesk kak literaturovedcheskaya problema // Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gercena. – 2008. – №51. – S. 86-95.
6 6.Shapaj T. Qazaqty’nh zhany’. – Astana: Elorda, 2001. – 284 b.
взаимовлияния литератур. – Н. Новгород, 1997. – С. 209.
2.Николаев Д.П. Сатира Щедрина и реалистический
гротеск. – М., 1977. – С. 358.
3 3.Бахтин М.М. Литературно-критические статьи. – М.: Худ. лит., 1986. – С. 543.
4 4.Қожакеев Т. Сатира негіздері. – Алматы: Санат, 1996. – 464 б.
5 5.Дормидонова Т.Ю. Гротеск как литературоведческая
проблема // Известия РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена. – 2008. – №51. – С. 86-95.
6 6.Шапай Т. Қазақтың жаны. – Астана: Елорда, 2001. – 284 б.
1 1.Kozlova D.V. Grotesk v teorii iskusstva // Voprosy vzaimovliyaniya literatur. – N. Novgorod, 1997. – S. 209.
2 2.Nikolaev D.P. Satira SHCHedrina i realisticheskij grotesk. – M., 1977. – S. 358.
3 3.Bahtin M.M. Literaturno-kriticheskie stat’i. – M.: Hud. lit., 1986. – S. 543.
4 4.Qozhakeev T. Sati’ra negіzderі. – Almaty’: Sanat, 1996. – 464 b.
5 5.Dormidonova T.YU. Grotesk kak literaturovedcheskaya problema // Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gercena. – 2008. – №51. – S. 86-95.
6 6.Shapaj T. Qazaqty’nh zhany’. – Astana: Elorda, 2001. – 284 b.
Downloads
How to Cite
Қабылов, Ә. Д. (2016). Grotesque: theory and application. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 159(1). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/1824
Issue
Section
Literary Critisim
