Transmission and proxemes in the literature works

Authors

  • A. С. Казмагамбетова KazNU named after Al-Farabi
  • Б. М. Калдыбаева KazNU named after Al-Farabi
  • Г. С. Койшыбаева KazNU named after Al-Farabi
        14 11

Keywords:

proxem, behavioral proxem, verbalization, mechanisms, ways and the methods

Abstract

In this article reviews the mechanisms, ways and the methods of the proxem verbalization and behavioral proxem in the language of art literature. On the anvil of the article, installed case of proxems, their role and position in the art language of Kazakh and Russian peoples. This is characterized by the verbal proxem of communicators, who are Russian and Kazakh native-speakers. This article based on the analysis of factual materials from artistic works of (M. Auezov «the way of Abay»).

References

1 1. Frumkina R.M. Psiholingvistika: ucheb. dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb.zavedenii. – M.: Akademiya, 2001. – 320 s.
2 2. Kratkii kazakhsko-russkii slovar’ / К. Bektaev, А. Аhabaev, Е. Kerimbaev, К. Moldabekov. – Аlmaty: Glavnaya redaksiya
Kazakhsoi sovetskoi entsiklopedii, 1991. – 256 s.
3 3. Auezov M. Abai zholy: Roman-epopeya. – Аlmaty: Zhazushy, 1990. – Т. 1.– 608 s.
4 4. Auezov М. Put’ Abaya. Roman. – Аlma-Аta: Zhazushy, 1977. – Т. 1. – 608 s.
5 5. Birdwhistell R.L. Introduction to kinesics / University of Louisville Press, Louisville. – Kentucky, 1952. – P. 55-67.
6 6. LaBarre W. The cultural basis of emotions and gestures // Journal ofcounceling personality. – 1948. – № 12. – P. 49-68.
7 7. Wundt W. The language of gestures. The Hague. – Mouton, 1973. – P. 47-59.
8 8. Johnson S. Japanese nonverbal communication. – Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1955. – P. 22-46.
9 9. Grigoriev S.A., Grigoriev N.V. Dictionary of Russian language gestures. – M., 2001. – 256 p.
10 10. Zhelezanova T.T. National specificity of non-verbal behavior of German media // Psycholinguistics and intercultural understanding:
Abstracts of the X All-Union Symposium on psycholinguistics and communication theory. – M., 1991. – P. 107-108.
11 11. Kulish L.O. Nonverbal communication code of human // Psycholinguistics and intercultural understanding: Abstracts of the
X All-Union Symposium on psycholinguistics and communication theory. – M., 1991. – P. 155-156.
12 12. Kreydlin G.E. Non-verbal semiotics in its relation to the verbal: Author. Dis. ... Dr. Philology. Sciences: 10.02.19. – M.,
2000. – 60 s.
13 13. Senchenko S.V. Paralinguistic means of verbal communication // Problems of verbal communication. – Almaty, 1987. – P.
117-122.
14 14. Sapozhnikov S.K.: Zhestualitet: Semantic and phylogenetic aspect // The semantic-pragmatic and sociolinguistic aspects of
language learning: Conference of young scientists and graduate students. – M., 1980. – S. 7.
15 15. Stolyarov М. Communication verbal and nonverbal means in the regulation of spontaneous dialogue // text as a unit of communication:
Proceedings. – M., 1991. – S. 23.
16 16. Sternin I.A. Communicative behavior in the structure of national culture // Ethnocultural specificity of linguistic consciousness.
– M., 2000. – S. 97-112.
17 17. Hall E.T. Proxemics // Current anthropology. – 1968. – № 9. – Р. 83-108.
18 18. A significant psychological dictionary / comp. and Society. Ed. B. Meshcheryakov, V.A. Zinchenko. – SPb .: EVROZNAK,
2005. – 672 p.
19 19. Reber А. Big explanatory psychological dictionary: 2 Vols – M.: Veche, AST, 2000. – T. 2. – 567 p.
20 20. Prokhorov A.M. Great Encyclopedic Dictionary. – M.: INFA-M, 1997. – 658 s.

Downloads

How to Cite

Казмагамбетова A. С., Калдыбаева, Б. М., & Койшыбаева, Г. С. (2016). Transmission and proxemes in the literature works. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 160(2). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/1925