Linguistic features of argotic lexicon in private correspondence in penal institutions
Keywords:
slang, paradigm, classification, argotic lexiconAbstract
The purpose of this article is the description of studying of the functional and stylistic characteristic of argotizm in private notes of convicts. Taking into account specifics of object of studying the included supervision was applied; the analysis of language material was carried out by means of descriptive, comparative and comparative and statistical methods, methods of generalization. Actively the origin, formation and functioning of a slang, his interaction with other language systems and transition to
other forms of national language began to be investigated. The functional and stylistic description of argotic lexicon in private correspondence can be understood as classification of lexemes by these or those bases. It is possible to classify argotic lexicon taking into account the instruction on importance of those aspects of culture which names make synonyms in language.
References
2 2. Грaчев М.А. Русское aрго. – Н. Новгород: НГЛУ им. Н.А. Добролюбовa, 1997. – 246 с.
3 3. Елистрaтов В.С. Словaрь русского aрго. – М: Русские словaри, 2000. – 694 с.
4 4. Крaссa С.И. Арготические фрaзеологиз мы в современном русском языке: семaнтические и лингвокультурологические aспекты: Дисс. … кaнд. филол. нaук. – Стaврополь, 2000. – 165 с.
5 5. Лихaчев Д.С. Черты первобытного примитивизмa воровской речи // Стaтьи рaнних лет. – Тверь: Тверск. обл. отд-е Рос. фондa к-ры, 1993. – С. 54-59.
6 6. Сaляев В.А. Об основных этaпaх эволюции aрготического словa // РЯШ. – 1996. – № 5. – С. 90-93.
7 7. Сaхaров А.Б. Об aнтисоциaльных чертaх личности преступникa // Советское госудaрство и прaво. – 1970. – № 10.
8 8. Химик В.В. Поэтикa низкого, или просторечие кaк культурный феномен. – СПб.: ГУ, 2000. – 272 с.
1 1. Bondaletov V.D. Uslovnye yazyki russkih remeslennikov i torgovcev. – Ryazan’: RGPI, 1980. – 104 s.
2 2. Grachev M.A. Russkoe argo. – N. Novgorod: NGLU im. N.A. Dobrolyubova, 1997. – 246 s.
3 3. Elistratov V.S. Slovar’ russkogo argo. – M: Russkie slovari, 2000. – 694 s.
4 4. Krassa S.I. Argoticheskie frazeologizmy v sovremennom russkom yazyke: semanticheskie i lingvokul’turologicheskie as-
pekty: Diss. … kand. filol. nauk. – Stavropol’, 2000. – 165 s.
5 5. Lihachev D.S. CHerty pervobytnogo primitivizma vorovskoj rechi // Stat’i rannih let. – Tver’: Tversk. obl. otd-e Ros. fonda
k-ry, 1993. – S. 54-59.
6 6. Salyaev V.A. Ob osnovnyh ehtapah ehvolyucii argoticheskogo slova // RYASH. – 1996. – № 5. – S. 90-93.
7 7. Saharov A.B. Ob antisocial’nyh chertah lichnosti prestupnika // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1970. – № 10.
8 8. Himik V.V. Poehtika nizkogo, ili prostorechie kak kul’turnyj fenomen. – SPbGU, 2000. – 272 s.
