To the question of interacts form and criteria of their classification.

Authors

  • Sh. I. Nurgozhina Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби, г. Алматы
  • G. H. Isengalieva Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби, г. Алматы
  • A. B. Umurtaeva Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби, г. Алматы
        19 24

Keywords:

verbal interact, an eczolinguistic communication, the "disinterested" and not finalized character, endolinguistic conversation, the place characteristic, the purpose,

Abstract

The classification of verbal interacts in the article which is closely aligned with the general theory of speech acts are considered. Whereby the concepts of structure developed in it and functions of speech activity are used. Various definitions of interacts are given. The typological characteristic of verbal interacts proceeds from the comparative studying of their structural and functional properties as its subject is the speech action considered in the format of their social functions and spheres of use, and also the internal organization of interact as a system. The peculiar features of interact are considered. The conducted short research of some special types of speech interaction allows to allocate a number of criteria which can form starting base for creation of typology interacts. Situations at which there can be communicative failures are analyzed and the ways of their overcoming are pointed out . In the conclusion it is noted that studied categories, as well as any other theoretical constructions, carry abstract and "ideal" character and therefore they are never realized in pure form in empirical reality in a certain measure.

References

1 Shegloff C.A. a) Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist. –1968.б) Goffman E L’ordre de l’interaction. – Paris: Sociétés, 1987. – P. 14. 8-16;
2 Notes on a Conversational Practice. Formulating Place in Sudnow, 1972. – P. 61-97.
3 Andre-Larouchebouvy D. La conversation quotidienne. – Paris: Didier Credif, 1984.
4 Якубинский Л.П. Язык и его функционирование. – М., 1986. – 207 с.
5 Sinclair A., Coulthard R.V. Towards and Analysis of Discourse. – The English used by teachers and pupils. – Oxford:Oxford Univ. Press. – P. 7-55.
6 Sacks H.,Schegloff E.,Jefferson G.A. Simples systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. – Schekein,1978. – P. 7-55.
7 Alber J-L. а) Interlangue et conversation exolingue.Cahier du departement des langues et des science du langiage. – Université
de Lausanne, 1985. – P. 30-47;
б) Vers un model exolingue. De la communication interculturelle: interparole,cooperation et conversation, Etudes de la linguistique appliquée. – 1986. – P. 78-89.
8 Gulich E., Kotschi T. Les actes de reformulations dans la consultation. – Bange, 1987. – P. 15-81.
9 Gulich E. Soul n'est pas un mot français Procédés d'évaluation et de commentaires métadiscursifs dans un corpus de conversations en situations de contact. – DRLAV, 1986. – P. 34-35, 161-282.
10 Сулейменова Э.Д. .Казахский и русский языки: основы контрастивной лингвистики. – Алматы: Демеу, 1986.
11 Di Pietro J.F. de Conversations exotigues.Une approche linguistique des interactions interculturelles, in Cosnier et al. – Paris,1988. – P. 251-267.
12 Joos M. The Five Clocks. La Haye.Mouton. – 1962.

Downloads

How to Cite

Nurgozhina, S. I., Isengalieva, G. H., & Umurtaeva, A. B. (2015). To the question of interacts form and criteria of their classification. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 148(2). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/153