Enhancing interdisciplinary cooperation through EFL

Authors

  • S. А. Yeshengazina Kazakh-British Technical University
        24 8

Keywords:

interdisciplinarity, tandem teaching, proficiency level, modern teaching approach, CLIL

Abstract

The paper addresses the challenges of modern teaching approaches in one of recently established international higher education schools with CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) in Kazakhstan. To tackle the problems arising from the shortcomings of local school education, particularly from little or lack of focus on preparation of schoolchildren for CLIL-based programmes [2], tandem teaching or interdisciplinarity seem to be the call of the day in such international programmes. The research based on experimental teaching has revealed the beneficial impact of tandem teaching on the learners’ academic performance. However, there are issues that need to be considered carefully while planning and organising the learning process.

References

1. Boud D, Feletti G.. I. The challenge of problem-based learning // Second edition. ─ Kogan page limited. ─ 1997. ─ P. 13-18. http://books.google.kz/books?id=zvyBq6k6tWUC&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&dq=Boud,+David+%281987%29:+Problem Based+Learning+in+Perspective.&source=bl&ots=PLplJ83pn5&sig=5bGh9CbboLJyo2GEd7oGPUi6iUg&hl=ru&sa=X&ei=L_3XU
KvRNPPZ4QS__YHICA&sqi=2&ved=0CG4Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=Boud%2C%20David%20%281987%29%3A%20Problem Based%20Learning%20in%20Perspective.&f=false
2. Brewster J. Content-based language teaching: a way to keep students motivated and challenged? CATS: The IATEFL young learners SIG publication. ─ 2004. ─ P. 3-9.
3. Brewster J. Teaching English through content: supporting good practice. In Kennedy, C. (ed) Innovation and Best Practice. ─ London:Longman. ─ 1999. ─ P. 83-95.
4. Klein, J. T. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice. ─ Detroit, Wayne State University. ─ 1990. ─ 140 p.
5. Lattuca, L. Creating interdisciplinarity: interdisciplinary research and teaching among College and university faculty. Nashville, Vanderbilt University Press. ─ 2001. ─ 296 p.
6. Nielsen A. E. Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries: New Challenges to Higher Education. PDF. ─ Retrieved 03.02.2013 from Nielsen ask.reference.com/web?q=What Is Cross Disciplinarity&o=100100.
7. Popescu T., Pioariu R. and HerŃeg C. Cross-disciplinary approaches to the English language:theory and practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ─ 2011. ─ 118 p. http://www.c-s-p.org/flyers/978-1-4438-3389-9 sample.pdf
8. Met, M. Curriculum decision-making in content-based language teaching. In Cenoz, J. & Genesee, F. (eds.) Beyond Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. ─ 1998. ─ P. 31-45.
9. Yeshengazina S., Kerimkulova S. Project-based learning in English classrooms. A Self-study guide for students and English teachers. Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty. ─ 2011. ─ 44 p.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-19

How to Cite

Yeshengazina S. А. (2015). Enhancing interdisciplinary cooperation through EFL. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 143(3). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/203