Anthropocentrism as a new direction of modern linguistic paradigm
23 25
Кілттік сөздер:
anthropocentric direction, linguistics, national values, spiritual existence, process of globalization.Аннотация
The article deals with the problems of anthropocentric paradigm and the use of its principles in different scientific fields, especially in linguistics. The article covers different principles and points of views of scientists concerning interrelationship between the language and human existence. On the basis of continuity of theoretical-cognitive paradigm of research of modern linguistics with traditional research was revealed the fact that the complex research in anthropocentric direction according to the needs of contemporary science is the main problem at present. The article also deals with human factor and spiritual values of a nation. It contains information about the nature of the Kazakh nation, their world outlook, their cultural and cognitive concepts representing their cultural peculiarity.Библиографиялық сілтемелер
1 1.Моmynova B. New directions and typical relations in the language. – Аlmaty: Аrys, 2009. – 160 p.
2 2.Gurevitsch P.S. Anthropocentrism as philosophic position. Philosophical anthropology. – M., 2001. – 160 p.
3 3.Аlpatov V.М. Wilhelm Humboldt. In Book: History of linguistic studies. Second edition. – М., 1999. – 368 p.
4 4.Оrasbaeva F. Linguistic relation. – Аlmaty: Dictionary, 2005. – 272 p.
5 5.Gylyga А.V. German classical philosophy. – М., 1986. – 334 p.
6 6.Zhanpeisov Е. Ethnocultural lexis of the Kazakh language. – Аlmaty: Science, 1989. – 282 p.
7 7.Zhaksybaeva М.А. Ethnographic phraseologisms of the Kazakh and Russian languages. Dissertation. – Аlmaty, 1997.
8 8.Kаidar A. Current problems of the Kazakh Language. – Аlmaty, 1998. – 304 p.
9 9.Маnkeeva Zh.А. Cognitive fundamentals of ethnocultural concepts in the Kazakh language. –Аlmaty: Zhybek Zholy, 2008.
– 354 p.
10 10.Tschesnokova N.V. Anthropocentric conception of works S.N.Sergeev –Tsenskogo: linguistic aspect: Dissertation. –
Таmbov, 2003.
11 11.Кubrjakova Е.S. Evolution of linguistic ideas in the Second part of XX century (paradigm analysis) //Language and Science
of the end of XX century: Collection of articles. – М., 1995. – P. 144–238.
2 2.Gurevitsch P.S. Anthropocentrism as philosophic position. Philosophical anthropology. – M., 2001. – 160 p.
3 3.Аlpatov V.М. Wilhelm Humboldt. In Book: History of linguistic studies. Second edition. – М., 1999. – 368 p.
4 4.Оrasbaeva F. Linguistic relation. – Аlmaty: Dictionary, 2005. – 272 p.
5 5.Gylyga А.V. German classical philosophy. – М., 1986. – 334 p.
6 6.Zhanpeisov Е. Ethnocultural lexis of the Kazakh language. – Аlmaty: Science, 1989. – 282 p.
7 7.Zhaksybaeva М.А. Ethnographic phraseologisms of the Kazakh and Russian languages. Dissertation. – Аlmaty, 1997.
8 8.Kаidar A. Current problems of the Kazakh Language. – Аlmaty, 1998. – 304 p.
9 9.Маnkeeva Zh.А. Cognitive fundamentals of ethnocultural concepts in the Kazakh language. –Аlmaty: Zhybek Zholy, 2008.
– 354 p.
10 10.Tschesnokova N.V. Anthropocentric conception of works S.N.Sergeev –Tsenskogo: linguistic aspect: Dissertation. –
Таmbov, 2003.
11 11.Кubrjakova Е.S. Evolution of linguistic ideas in the Second part of XX century (paradigm analysis) //Language and Science
of the end of XX century: Collection of articles. – М., 1995. – P. 144–238.
Жүктелулер
Как цитировать
Егизбаева, Н. Ж., Есимова, Ж. Д., & Бекишева Р. M. (2016). Anthropocentrism as a new direction of modern linguistic paradigm. ҚазҰУ Хабаршысы. Филология сериясы, 158(6). вилучено із https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/1674
Шығарылым
Бөлім
Языкознание
