The research in the sphere of political linguistics

Authors

  • И. Г. Оразбекова әл-Фараби атындағы Қазақ ұлттық университеті
  • Р. M. Таева әл-Фараби атындағы Қазақ ұлттық университеті
  • Л. Ж. Мұсалы әл-Фараби атындағы Қазақ ұлттық университеті
        43 34

Keywords:

political discourse, language policy, content analysis, ide¬ology, metaphorics.

Abstract

The article considers the main directions of research in the field of political linguistics. The last decades of the XX century and the beginning of the XXI century are marked by radical changes in the political structure of the world. The example is the collapse of two hostile camps (socialist and capitalist), and integration in Europe due to the globalization process. Politics, its institutions and processes do not exist regardless of the language and linguistic processes in the society. Political institution can not exist without communication. Thus, political texts and statements reflect the ideology, the system of natural-historical development of society and are a means of influencing public consciousness, i.e. they are characterized by the function of governing the society. Consequently, the study of political language was initiated by political problems, i.e. by the attempts of the thinking part of the society to free political communication from manipulation, as well as the needs of linguistic theory to determine the role of the linguistic phenomenon in political life (the use of euphemisms, metaphors).

References

1 Мухарямов Н.М., Мухарямова Л.М. Политическая
лингвистика как научная дисциплина // Политическая
наука. – №3. – 2014. – C. 44-60.
2 Баранов А.Н. Введение в прикладную лингвистику. – М: Эдиториал, УРСС, 2001. – С. 246-257.
3 Толпыгина О.А. Дискурс и дискурс-анализ в политической науке // Политическая наука. – № 3. – 2002. – С. 72-86.
4 Ахатова Б.А. Особенности политической коммуникации
// Вестник КазУМОиМЯ, серия «Филология». – № 3 (9). –
2004. – С. 23-32.
5 Чудинов А.П. Политическая лингвистика: Учеб. пособие.
– М.: 2006. – 256с.
6 Баранов А.Н. О типах сочетаемости метафорических
моделей // Вопросы языкознания. – 2003. – № 2. – С. 73-94.
7 Опарина Е.О. Метафора в политическом дискурсе // Политическая наука. – 2002. – № 3. – С. 24.
8 Шейгал Е.И. Семиотика политического дискурса.
Дисс…докт. фил.наук. –Волгоград, 2000. – 431 с.
9 Герасимов В.И., Ильин М.В. Политический дискурс-
анализ // Политическая наука. – 2002. – № 3. – С. 61-71.

1 Muharyamov N.M., Muharyamova L.M. Politicheskaya lingvistika kak nauchnaya distsiplina // Politicheskaya nauka. – №3. – 2014. – C. 44-60.
2 Baranov A.N. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu lingvistiku. – M: Editorial, URSS, 2001. – S. 246-257.
3 Tolpygina O.A. Diskurs i diskurs-analiz v politicheskoy nauke // Politicheskaya nauka. – № 3. – 2002. – S. 72-86.
4 Ahatova B.A. Osobennosti politicheskoy kommunikatsii // Vestnik KazUMOiMYa, seriya «Filologiya». – № 3 (9). – 2004.
– S. 23-32.
5 Chudinov A.P. Politicheskaya lingvistika: Ucheb. posobie. – M.: 2006. – 256s.
6 Baranov A.N. O tipah sochetaemosti metaforicheskih modeley // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. – 2003. – № 2. – S. 73-94.
7 Oparina E.O. Metafora v politicheskom diskurse // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2002. – № 3. – S. 24.
8 Sheygal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Diss…dokt. fil.nauk. –Volgograd, 2000. – 431 s.
9 Gerasimov V.I., Il’in M.V. Politicheskiy diskurs-analiz // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2002. – № 3. – S. 61-71.

Downloads

How to Cite

Оразбекова, И. Г., Таева Р. M., & Мұсалы, Л. Ж. (2016). The research in the sphere of political linguistics. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 153(1). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/1539