Participant-internal possibility modality and its coding in Kazakh.
38 27
Keywords:
modality, participant-internal possibility modality, analytical formant, converb, ability, functional semantic- field, tense, voice,Abstract
This paper deals with the subcategory of modality – participant-internal possibility modality and its coding in Kazakh with – A al analytical formant. Despite the fact that the category of modality has been studied from the period of Aristotle, there is still no unanimity about its definition, its subcategories and its coding in human language. As the result of the research on the topic participant-internal possibility modality is identified as one of the subcategory of modality which deals with the ability and capacity of the subject of the proposition. In Kazakh participant-internal possibility modality is mostly given by analytical formants, especially by – A al. Moreover, it will be displayed that – A al expresses all semantic properties of participant-internal possibility modality such as inherent / learnt and mental / physical. Therefore it constitutes the core of the functional-semantic of the given modality. The paper also accounts for the interaction of – A al in modal usage with other category operators.References
1 Van Der Auwera J., Plungian V.A. Modality’s semantic map // Linguistic Typology. – 1998. – № 2. – P. 79–124.
2 Bybee J., Fleischman S. Modality in Grammar and discourse. – Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing company,
1995. – 575 p.
3 Bybee J., R. Perkins and W. Pagliuca. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. –Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. – 420 p.
4 Palmer F.R. Modality and the English modals. – 2 Edition. – London: Logman, 1990. –256 p.
5 Palmer F.R. Mood and modality. – 3 Edition. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. – 236 p.
6 Howard C. The good English Guide. – Kent: Mackeys Ltd, 1993. – 97 p.
7 Erdal M.A. Grammar of Old Tukic. – Netherlands: Brill NV, 2004. – 583 p.
8 Oralbaeva N. Qazaq tilindegi etistiktiƞ analitikalïq formanttarïnïƞ qurïlïsï men maġïnasï. – Almaty: Ġïlïm baspasï, 1979. –195 p.
9 Clauson G. An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972. – 1040 p.
10 Schönig C. (Un)Möglichkeitsformen in den sogenannten Altaischen Sprachen // Materialia Turcica. – 1987. – № 13. – P. 1–28.
11 Rentzsch J. Modality in the Baburnama // Turkic languages. – 2011. – № 15. – P. 82–83.
2 Bybee J., Fleischman S. Modality in Grammar and discourse. – Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing company,
1995. – 575 p.
3 Bybee J., R. Perkins and W. Pagliuca. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. –Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. – 420 p.
4 Palmer F.R. Modality and the English modals. – 2 Edition. – London: Logman, 1990. –256 p.
5 Palmer F.R. Mood and modality. – 3 Edition. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. – 236 p.
6 Howard C. The good English Guide. – Kent: Mackeys Ltd, 1993. – 97 p.
7 Erdal M.A. Grammar of Old Tukic. – Netherlands: Brill NV, 2004. – 583 p.
8 Oralbaeva N. Qazaq tilindegi etistiktiƞ analitikalïq formanttarïnïƞ qurïlïsï men maġïnasï. – Almaty: Ġïlïm baspasï, 1979. –195 p.
9 Clauson G. An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972. – 1040 p.
10 Schönig C. (Un)Möglichkeitsformen in den sogenannten Altaischen Sprachen // Materialia Turcica. – 1987. – № 13. – P. 1–28.
11 Rentzsch J. Modality in the Baburnama // Turkic languages. – 2011. – № 15. – P. 82–83.
Downloads
How to Cite
Yeshniyaz, G. S. (2015). Participant-internal possibility modality and its coding in Kazakh. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 150(4-5). Retrieved from https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/724
Issue
Section
Young Authors
